Connect with us

Australia

Jenny McCarthy and Eva LaRue accuse Steven Seagal

By Tracy Wright For Dailymail.com
Published: 01:57 EST, 11 November 2017 | Updated: 08:56 EST, 11 N..

Published

on

By Tracy Wright For Dailymail.com

Published: 01:57 EST, 11 November 2017 | Updated: 08:56 EST, 11 November 2017

Two more Hollywood actresses have come forward with sexual harassment accusations against Steven Seagal.

Jenny McCarthy, 45, had first reported the story to Movieline in 1998, saying Steven requested McCarthy take her clothes off during the audition for a part in Under Siege 2 in 1995, but spoke more in-depth about her alleged experience on her Sirius XM radio show on Thursday.

Actress Eva LaRue claimed to Deadline Seagal locked her in a room as he wore an open kimono and underwear when she went to his house for an audition when she was just age 22.

The allegations against Seagal cap off another week that saw several high profile men in entertainment behavior being called into question. New allegations have sparked against Star Trek's George Takaei, as well as against comedian Louis C.K.

Takei has been accused of groping a former male model while the man was passed out in his Los Angeles condo in 1981. Louis meanwhile has been accused of sexual misconduct.

Speaking up: Jenny McCarthy accused Steven Seagal of sexual harassment in 1995 on her Sirius XM radio show Thursday afternoon (pictured October 2017)Coming forward: Actress Eva La Rue claims she was just 22 years old when Seagal locked her in a room as he opened his kimono while wearing only his underwear when she went to his house for an audition (pictured October 2017)Coming forward: Actress Eva La Rue claims she was just 22 years old when Seagal locked her in a room as he opened his kimono while wearing only his underwear when she went to his house for an audition (pictured October 2017)

Speaking up: Jenny McCarthy accused Steven Seagal of sexual harassment in 1995 on her Sirius XM radio show Thursday afternoon. Also actress Eva La Rue (right) claims she was just 22 years old when Seagal locked her in a room as he opened his kimono while wearing only his underwear when she went to his house for an audition

Meanwhile: A Hollywood executive also reported being sexually harassed by Seagal on the set of the 1991 movie Out for Justice, according to Page Six; seen in 2009Meanwhile: A Hollywood executive also reported being sexually harassed by Seagal on the set of the 1991 movie Out for Justice, according to Page Six; seen in 2009

Meanwhile: A Hollywood executive also reported being sexually harassed by Seagal on the set of the 1991 movie Out for Justice, according to Page Six; seen in 2009

On her SiriusXM Radio Show on Thursday, Jenny explained: 'So I stand across from him and he plops onto a sofa that’s near a fireplace — of course it is — and taps the sofa cushion next to him saying, 'Take a seat. Relax."'

Jenny said that Steven continued, 'You know, this part has nudity in it and I can’t really tell what your body looks like in that dress that you’re wearing.'

The radio show host said that she was alone in the room with the actor at the time of the ordeal.

'But I so wanted to legitimately read for this part that I wasn’t gonna give up yet,' McCarthy said.

Previously: The 45-year-old television personality had first reported the story to Movieline in 1998, saying Steven requested McCarthy take her clothes off during the audition for a part in Under Siege 2; seen in New York in OctoberPreviously: The 45-year-old television personality had first reported the story to Movieline in 1998, saying Steven requested McCarthy take her clothes off during the audition for a part in Under Siege 2; seen in New York in October

Previously: The 45-year-old television personality had first reported the story to Movieline in 1998, saying Steven requested McCarthy take her clothes off during the audition for a part in Under Siege 2; seen in New York in October

'So I told him, I said, 'Listen. My agent says there’s no nudity. I specifically asked her and she said no.' And you know what he says to me? 'Well, there is off-camera nudity.'

McCarthy said she promptly left the audition room but was followed by Seagal who allegedly threatened her, 'Don't tell anybody or else.'

McCarthy had previously told Moveline about the alleged experience, which Seagal denied through his representative to The Daily Beast.

'Warner Brothers casting for the film Under Siege 2 has confirmed that Jenny McCarthy never auditioned for a role on Under Siege 2. Her claim is completely false,' a spokesperson said.

Eva, meanwhile, told Deadline she went to Steven's house for an audition when she was 22 'against her better judgement.'

'Sure enough, there were two other guys and some woman who was supposed to be the casting director. And there we were, sitting in his living room, talking about the character I was going to play and the story plot and what they’re looking for – the usual audition chitchat. But I didn’t have the sides. It was a meeting but not a reading. And then the casting director said, "I think she’s perfect for the role."

She claims Seagall, who was in his kimono, asked her to come with him to retrieve the script.

'I don't know why we don’t have the script in the living room where we were meeting, but I said, "OK," and I follow him, thinking we’re going to his office. We go down the hallway to this room, which is like an office and guest room kind of thing. And he says, "Have a seat on the couch.’ It was like a literal casting couch.'

On her radio show: Jenny spoke about her allegations during Thursday's Sirius XM Radio show On her radio show: Jenny spoke about her allegations during Thursday's Sirius XM Radio show 

On her radio show: Jenny spoke about her allegations during Thursday's Sirius XM Radio show

'And as I was walking towards the couch, with my back towards the door, he’s busy closing and locking the doors behind my back. I go to sit on the couch, and he comes towards me and he’s opening his weirdo kimono.

'There’s no script or anything. Just him standing there with his kimono open. He had underwear on, thank God, and he was bare everywhere else. And it was clear he was not just getting cozy.'

Eva alleges that she attempted to leave the room, but found it had been locked from the inside.

'I’m fumbling with the lock and he says, ‘No, no, come back. You’ve got to stay. Come sit on the couch and have a drink with me,' she told Deadline.

Claims: She claims Seagall, who was in his kimono, asked her to come with him to retrieve the script (pictured November 2017)Claims: She claims Seagall, who was in his kimono, asked her to come with him to retrieve the script (pictured November 2017)

Claims: She claims Seagall, who was in his kimono, asked her to come with him to retrieve the script (pictured November 2017)

Eva says she managed to get out and told Seagal to 'send the script to my agent.'

She says he never touched her.

Meanwhile, a female Hollywood executive, who asked to remain nameless for fear of repercussions, was reportedly lured into Seagal's trailer for a 'costume change' on the set of the 1991 movie Out for Justice.

The woman claimed to Page Six that Steven tried to see her in various states of undress while on set and even invited her over the phone to listen to Gregg Allman's music for the soundtrack at the Hotel Bel Air.

After telling Steven she was uncomfortable, she says Seagal replied during their phone conversation, 'You are not comfortable about coming over and sitting on my face for an hour?'

Segal's lawyer Marty Siger told Page Six, 'This is totally false … It is interesting this person doesn’t give her name to give her claims legitimacy.'

The women join a number of ladies – including Portia De Rossi – who have come forward with accusations of sexual misconduct against Seagal.

Representatives for Seagal have been contacted by DailyMail.com for comment.

Denial: Segal's lawyer Marty Siger told Page Six, 'This is totally false ... It is interesting this person doesn’t give her name to give her claims legitimacy'; seen in 2014Denial: Segal's lawyer Marty Siger told Page Six, 'This is totally false ... It is interesting this person doesn’t give her name to give her claims legitimacy'; seen in 2014

Denial: Segal's lawyer Marty Siger told Page Six, 'This is totally false … It is interesting this person doesn’t give her name to give her claims legitimacy'; seen in 2014

Read more:

Let's block ads! (Why?)

[contf] [contfnew] [hhm]Daily Mail[hhmc] [contfnewc] [contfnewc]

Continue Reading

Australia

Australia: Scott Morrison saga casts scrutiny on Queen’s representative

Published

on

In the past fortnight, Australia has been gripped by revelations that former Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison secretly appointed himself to several additional ministries.

The move has been labelled a “power grab” by his successor as prime minister, and Mr Morrison has been scolded by many – even his own colleagues.

But the scandal has also dragged Australia’s governor-general into the fray – sparking one of the biggest controversies involving the Queen’s representative in Australia in 50 years.

So does Governor-General David Hurley have questions to answer, or is he just collateral damage?

‘Just paperwork’

Governors-general have fulfilled the practical duties as Australia’s head of state since the country’s 1901 federation.

Candidates for the role were initially chosen by the monarch but are now recommended by the Australian government.

The job is largely ceremonial – a governor-general in almost every circumstance must act on the advice of the government of the day. But conventions allow them the right to “encourage” and “warn” politicians.

Key duties include signing bills into law, issuing writs for elections, and swearing in ministers.

Mr Hurley has run into trouble on the latter. At Mr Morrison’s request, he swore the prime minister in as joint minister for health in March 2020, in case the existing minister became incapacitated by Covid.

Over the next 14 months, he also signed off Mr Morrison as an additional minister in the finance, treasury, home affairs and resources portfolios.

Mr Morrison already had ministerial powers, so Mr Hurley was basically just giving him authority over extra departments.

It’s a request the governor-general “would not have any kind of power to override or reject”, constitutional law professor Anne Twomey tells the BBC.

“This wasn’t even a meeting between the prime minister and the governor-general, it was just paperwork.”

But Mr Morrison’s appointments were not publicly announced, disclosed to the parliament, or even communicated to most of the ministers he was job-sharing with.

Australia’s solicitor-general found Mr Morrison’s actions were not illegal but had “fundamentally undermined” responsible government.

But the governor-general had done the right thing, the solicitor-general said in his advice this week.

It would have been “a clear breach” for him to refuse the prime minister, regardless of whether he knew the appointments would be kept secret, Stephen Donaghue said.

Critics push for investigation

Ultimately, Mr Hurley had to sign off on Mr Morrison’s requests, but critics say he could have counselled him against it and he could have publicised it himself.

But representatives for the governor-general say these types of appointments – giving ministers the right to administer other departments – are not unusual.

And it falls to the government of the day to decide if they should be announced to the public. They often opt not to.

Mr Hurley himself announcing the appointments would be unprecedented. He had “no reason to believe that appointments would not be communicated”, his spokesperson said.

Emeritus professor Jenny Hocking finds the suggestion Mr Hurley didn’t know the ministries had been kept secret “ridiculous”.

“The last of these bizarre, duplicated ministry appointments… were made more than a year after the first, so clearly by then the governor-general did know that they weren’t being made public,” she says.

“I don’t agree for a moment that the governor-general has a lot of things on his plate and might not have noticed.”

The historian says it’s one of the biggest controversies surrounding a governor-general since John Kerr caused a constitutional crisis by sacking Prime Minister Gough Whitlam in 1975.

Prof Hocking famously fought for transparency around that matter – waging a lengthy and costly legal battle that culminated in the release of Mr Kerr’s correspondence with the Queen.

And she says the same transparency is needed here.

The Australian public need to know whether Mr Hurley counselled the prime minister against the moves, and why he didn’t disclose them

The government has already announced an inquiry into Mr Morrison’s actions, but she wants it to look at the governor-general and his office too.

“If the inquiry is to find out what happened in order to fix what happened, it would be extremely problematic to leave out a key part of that equation.”

Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull – Mr Morrison’s predecessor – has also voiced support for an inquiry.

“Something has gone seriously wrong at Government House,” he told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

“It is the passive compliance along the chain… that did undermine our constitution and our democracy… that troubles me the most. This is how tyranny gets under way.”

PM defends governor-general

Prof Twomey says the criticism of Mr Hurley is unfair – there’s was no “conspiracy” on his part to keep things secret.

“I don’t think it’s reasonable for anyone to expect that he could have guessed that the prime minister was keeping things secret from his own ministers, for example.

“Nobody really thought that was a possibility until about two weeks ago.”

Even if he had taken the unprecedented step to publicise the appointments or to reject Mr Morrison’s request, he’d have been criticised, she says.

“There’d be even more people saying ‘how outrageous!'” she says. “The role of governor-general is awkward because people are going to attack you either way.”

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has also defended Mr Hurley, saying he was just doing his job.

“I have no intention of undertaking any criticism of [him].”

A role fit for purpose?

Prof Hocking says it’s a timely moment to look at the role of the governor-general more broadly.

She points out it’s possible the Queen may have been informed about Mr Morrison’s extra ministries when Australia’s parliament and people were not.

“It does raise questions about whether this is fit for purpose, as we have for decades been a fully independent nation, but we still have… ‘the relics of colonialism’ alive and well.”

Momentum for a fresh referendum on an Australian republic has been growing and advocates have seized on the controversy.

“The idea that the Queen and her representative can be relied upon to uphold our system of government has been debunked once and for all,” the Australian Republic Movement’s Sandy Biar says.

“It’s time we had an Australian head of state, chosen by Australians and accountable to them to safeguard and uphold Australia’s constitution.”

But Prof Twomey says republicans are “clutching at straws” – under their proposals, the head of state would also have been bound to follow the prime minister’s advice.

“It wouldn’t result in any changes that would have made one iota of difference.”

 

Read from: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-62683210

Continue Reading

Australia

Australia election: PM Morrison’s security team in car crash in Tasmania

Published

on

A car carrying the Australian prime minister’s security team has crashed in Tasmania during an election campaign visit.

Four police officers were taken to hospital with “non-life threatening injuries” after the car and another vehicle collided, authorities said.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison was not in the car, but the accident prompted him to cancel the rest of his campaign events on Thursday.

The other driver involved was not hurt.

Tasmania Police said initial investigations suggested the second car had “collided with the rear of the police vehicle, while attempting to merge”. It caused the unmarked security vehicle to roll off the road.

The two Tasmania Police officers and two Australian Federal Police officers were conscious when taken to hospital for medical assessment, the prime minister’s office said.

“Family members of the officers have been contacted and are being kept informed of their condition,” a statement said.

“The PM is always extremely grateful for the protection provided by his security team and extends his best wishes for their recovery and to their families.”

Australians go to the polls on 21 May. Mr Morrison – prime minister since 2018 – is hoping to win his conservative coalition’s fourth term in office.

Polls suggest the opposition Labor Party, led by Anthony Albanese, is favoured to win. However, Mr Morrison defied similar polling to claim victory at the last election in 2019.

Mr Morrison’s Liberal-National coalition holds 76 seats in the House of Representatives – the minimum needed to retain power.

Political observers say the cost of living, climate change, trust in political leaders, and national security will be among key issues in the campaign.

In recent weeks, the prime minister has faced accusations of being a bully and once sabotaging a rival’s career by suggesting the man’s Lebanese heritage made him less electable. Mr Morrison has denied the allegations.

Mr Albanese stumbled into his own controversy this week when he failed to recall the nation’s unemployment or interest rates.

Read from: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-61103987

Continue Reading

Australia

Sydney airport warns delays could last weeks on third day of travel chaos

Published

on

Long queues at Sydney airport’s domestic terminals have continued for a third day, with some passengers missing international connections, as the airport warns delays resulting from a surge in travellers and a shortfall in security staff could continue for weeks.

Chaotic scenes were reported in the departure halls as early as 4.30am on Saturday, with some frustrated travellers, many of whom heeded the pleas of airport chiefs to arrive at least two hours before their domestic flight was due to take off, claiming only one security line was operating.

While the queues that formed early on Saturday are understood to have cleared later in the morning, the airport apologised to affected travellers.

“Traffic numbers are picking up and the close contact rules are making it hard to fill shifts and staff the airport. We appreciate your patience,” Sydney airport said on its Twitter account.

A wave of families travelling as the term two school holidays begin this weekend, combined with close contact rules that are understood to be taking out about 20% of security shifts in any given day, are driving the problem.

Certis, the company that Sydney airport contracts for its security operations, is desperately trying to recruit personnel, while the airport has reallocated back office, IT and retail workers to the departure hall to comb queues so they can prioritise passengers at risk of missing their flight.

“We are working around the clock to resolve these issues and have teams in the terminals bringing passengers forward in order of priority,” a Sydney airport spokesperson said.

He added that the airport is “anticipating it will [be] busy right through the school holiday period and peak over the Easter and Anzac Day weekends, in some cases at 90% of pre-Covid passenger levels”.

“We’re deeply grateful to passengers for their ongoing patience and we’re sorry to everyone who has been inconvenienced,” the spokesperson said. “We would also like to thank passengers for getting to the airport early and treating staff and each other with kindness and respect.”

The Qantas chief executive Alan Joyce was forced to clarify comments he made on Friday that passengers were “not match fit” and that those forgetting to remove laptops and aerosols from their bags at the security check contributing to the delays.

“Just to be clear, I’m not ‘blaming’ passengers,” Joyce said. “Of course it’s not their fault,” he said.

Qantas shed thousands of staff during the pandemic, and outsourced ground crews in a decision that was challenged in court.

On Saturday, Qantas also apologised to a Melbourne family left stranded in Sydney, after domestic flight delays caused them to miss an international trip.

Javiera Martinez, her partner Daniel Capurro and their three children were supposed to be flying to Chile on Friday to visit relatives they had not seen in three years.

But after their 8am Qantas flight from Melbourne was delayed by half an hour, baggage handling and airport transfer delays in Sydney meant they couldn’t make their 11.30am LATAM Airlines flight to Santiago.

Martinez said the airline’s procedures at the airport were chaotic.

“We think Qantas didn’t behave appropriately. I got berated by the person at the counter – they never apologised, they never assumed any responsibility at all,” she said. “It was a rude conversation. We have been mistreated badly I would say.”

The PCR tests they need to travel have now expired and they will have to take them again as they wait for seats on the next flight to Santiago from Sunday.

The airline has apologised and paid for a night’s accommodation in Sydney.

“We sincerely apologise that the family missed their connecting flight on another airline due to delays moving through Sydney airport on Friday,” a Qantas spokesperson said.

The family is among many affected by hold ups amid the busiest travel period in two years, with Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane airports warning passengers to arrive two hours before domestic flights.

source

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 , madridjournals.com