Electricity users suffering for past governments misguided ideological intervention, says expert
Electricity prices soared 55 percent for households and small businesses in Ontario on Nov. 1. The provinces residents pay 22 percent more for electricity, on average, than the rest of Canada, according to a study by the Fraser Institute published Nov. 5.
The Progressive Conservative government hasnt managed to cut electricity bills, an election campaign promise. But bad decisions by politicians a decade ago have hamstrung the current administrations ability to make much of an improvement.
The Fraser Institute study, titled “The Ontario Governments Electricity Policies 2018-2019: How They Are Failing and How to Fix Them,” proposes the radical solution of passing laws to cancel or renegotiate fixed-price guaranteed contracts to green energy providers, which are the culprits for rising electricity bills. Meanwhile the province adds to its massive debt load by having to provide energy rebates.
The province is suffering due to a classic case of past excessive government meddling, which also disregarded the proper functioning of markets by basing decision-making on ideology rather than evidence, according to Carleton University business professor Ian Lee. Lee also advocates legally terminating the guaranteed prices to green energy providers.
In 2009, Ontarios Liberal leadership implemented a push to greener, renewable energy sources—namely wind, solar, hydro, and biomass—by subsidizing guaranteed above-market prices for a minimum of 20 years.
“This is green ideological madness,” Lee said.
Between 2003 and 2014, Ontario was shutting down coal-fired power plants while replacing them with new natural gas, wind, and solar plants. The result, however, was that it ended up producing more electricity than it needed, as electricity usage was trending lower.
The heavy users of electricity in Ontarios economy were declining, like manufacturing and pulp and paper milling, as the economy was becoming more service-oriented. Consumers were also becoming more energy-conscious and efficient with heating and appliances.
Yet Ontarians have to pay for the electricity whether they use it or not. It cant be stored for a rainy day.
Going green used to be so en vogue. “I think they got seduced by their own rhetoric,” Lee said about Ontarios Liberal government a decade ago.
What led to the quandary hydro consumers now face, he explains, was the Green Energy Act (GEA) put in place by the Liberals in 2009.
“Its a subsidy program where you charge everybody else and then pay it to the people who are being paid to produce solar and wind because it wasnt economic to produce,” Lee said.
Power generation is the biggest component of the monthly electricity bill, and thanks to the GEA, the more traditional sources of power like hydroelectric and nuclear get paid lower rates than renewable sources.
“The rate paid to solar generators (48.1¢/kWh) is more than six times the rate paid to nuclear generators (8¢/kWh), and more than seven times the rate paid to hydroelectric generators (6.3¢/kWh),” according to the Fraser Institute study.
The infamous global adjustment (GA), which grew from under $0.01 to about $0.10 per kWh between 2008 and 2017, is a surcharge for the difference between the going market wholesale price and the fixed-price guarantees. It also pays for some conservation programs and some costs related to nuclear power and gas capacity projects.
The Fraser Institute says the GA has gone up 13 percent in the year following the Progressive Conservatives rise to power in Ontario in June 2018. The GA must come down for electricity bills to fall.
The institutes study shows that payments to solar and bioenergy generators make up 15 percent of the GA yet only produce 3 percent of Ontarios electricity. The study goes on to say that if those generators were removed from the system and replaced with generators earning the market rate, the GA could be lowered by 15 percent.
The market-distorting supply behaviour is a case study of how legislation like the GEA can bring about a catastrophe. By granting energy producers guaranteed above-market prices, it eliminated any incentive for firms to work to remain competitive like they would in a normal market environment.
“If, for example, wind-power producers enter zero-price bids to maximize market share, it drives down the price paid to everyone else and thereby drives up the global adjustment liability throughout the entire electricity system, not just for wind companies,” said the Fraser Institute.
It was a government-driven decision that politicized the whole industry, putting supply and demand out of balance and dismantling the market mechanism for determining a fair price.
“In the last 10 or 15 years, it got very politicized, and green environmental groups started to lobby the politicians to become interventionist,” Lee said. “These are ideologues, not scientists, not energy engineers, and they started advocating things that made sense if you are a political activist.”
In February 2017, while the Liberals were still in power, Ontario Energy Minister Glenn Thibeault admitted that the GEAs implementation was problematic. Instead of setting targets for specific types of energy, the government should have made power generators compete for electricity contracts, he said.
“We must unleash the electricity sector and our system operator to find the appropriate mix to fulfil a capacity auction that would ensure ratepayers receive the best prices possible,” said Thibeault, as reported by Global News.
Lee and the FrRead More – Source