Health

Totals shameful lobbying on French palm oil tax break sparks ire

Issued on: Modified:

Several French lawmakers and environmentalists on Friday demanded a new vote on a controversial palm oil tax break after the National Assembly on Thursday approved, without debate, a delay to end the tax break. Critics say the vote followed a successful lobbying campaign by energy giant Total.

Advertising

Read more

On Thursday evening, the National Assembly adopted an amendment delaying until 2026 the end of palm oil's tax advantages, a move that benefits Total, which uses palm oil to create biofuel. The vote came despite an unfavourable opinion from the budget legislation's rapporteur, a member of President Emmanuel Macron's centrist LREM party.

Last year, the French parliament excluded palm oil from tax breaks for biofuel sources, a huge blow for a new Total refinery which began operating in July.

But Thursdays vote extended the tax break period “to leave a sufficient transition period for French companies to prepare for the end of palm oil in biofuels".

The amendment was pushed by MPs from the Bouches-du-Rhône department on the Mediterranean coast, where the refinery is located.

Environmentalists say palm oil drives deforestation, with vast areas of Southeast Asian rainforest having been logged or set ablaze in recent decades to make way for plantations.

"MPs in the majority, in collaboration with the government, have given in to Total's shameful lobbying," the Amis de la Terre (Friends of the Earth) advocacy group said after the vote.

It called the renewed tax break a "fiscal present" valued at €70 to 80 million ($77-$88 million).

Joël Giraud, a lawmaker from Macrons LREM party, blasted the vote, telling AFP on Friday that "we got screwed".

"If the group requests it, I will demand a second vote," he said.

But the budget ministry said Friday that no new vote was planned "for the time being".

Constitutional court upholds tax exclusion

Total had filed a lawsuit against the parliament's decision last year, saying lawmakers had unlawfully singled out palm oil.

But last month the constitutional court rejected that argument, saying "legislators, knowing about the global palm oil farming condRead More – Source

Related Posts